246. Hidden in plain sight




One of these days

I’m gonna pay it back, pay it back

Elvis Costello



Maggie returned from God’s lecture. The Place was buzzing,

Around 150,000 incoming souls were processed each day, about 600 a minute. She looked up. A wide belt conveyed souls into The Stacks for rest and rebooting. Around her, angels scurried: directing, comforting, issuing kind words. Maggie sensed her sports bag – with its smiling images of God, Jesus, Buddha and Satan – was attracting glances. Souls were seated in cafes to the left; sweating in gymnasia to the right. While pondering reincarnation options, they could inhabit a younger version of their last body. Rooms to undertake spiritual exercise sat at one end of a giant hallway; a massive theatre and cinema at the other.

Back in her room, she brought up the Akashic files on the wall, as instructed. “Akash, I need information.”

“Maggie, what a pleasure,” purred the system. “Have you enjoyed discussions with the boss?” She didn’t need chitchat. Tectonic plates had shifted. “A key piece of data please.”

“Maggie that would be an exquisite delight.” She cut in quickly. “Forget the pleasantries Akash. Or I’ll mute you, and read the answers on the wall.”

“State your question.”

“Delve into the Earth’s economic data. Retrieve statistics that show beyond any doubt that countries function better without a money system that pivots around interest-bearing debt.”

“Maggie, consider President Kennedy’s Order 11110 of June 4, 1963. This was signed with the authority to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States government at interest, allowing the government to begin printing its own, interest-free money, backed by silver bullion.”

“I know the details. Get on with it.”

“Government debt in 1963 stood at around $306 billion. By the end of 2013, it will have topped $17 trillion. Had JFK’s order stood across the 50 years, the successive governments could have printed enough money for their every need – including enough to have paid down all of the outstanding sovereign debt to zero.”

Maggie whistled. Having cut some of her sharpest political teeth on the stresses of the UK’s Public Sector Borrowing Requirement, the possibilities jumped out. No wringing of hands about debt ceilings. No government shutdowns. No interminable speculation about how far down the road refinancing could “kick the can”. And what about the harsh dismantling of the US welfare state? This had bequeathed the US with a homeless army, living in sewers, skips, tents or cardboard boxes. Guilty memories of Britain flooded back.

God’s claims were fully validated. As the US financial system stood, every dollar issued produced immediate debt – repayable by taxpayers – and subsequent inflation. Since the 1913 creation of the Federal Reserve, which was privately-owned and operated, the dollar had lost 97% of its value, Akash said. Worse, whenever the Fed cut back the money supply, which was in reality a debt supply, bankruptcies increased, allowing commercial banks to call in collateral. The scam was huge, and yet somehow unperceived. She needed more. “Akash, tell me what the US Constitution says about the country printing its own money?”

“The Constitution grants Congress the power to “coin money”, under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5. Congress controls the minting, and, theoretically, sets its value. But, in practice, from 1913, the power has lain with the Federal Reserve Bank, not Congress.”

Maggie asked Akash for the Founding Fathers’ view. The response was a quote from Thomas Jefferson, a principal author of the Declaration of Independence and the third US President. “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” Jefferson was a seer. In an 1816 letter, he wrote: “And I sincerely believe….banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

Maggie was having a Eureka moment. Words such as ‘golly’ bombarded her cerebral cortex. As private foreign bankers made inroads into the US economy, Jefferson had commented that “bank-paper must be suppressed, and the circulating medium must be restored to the nation to whom it belongs”.

“Bloody hell,” said Maggie. She was beginning to see why the Federal Reserve was reviled in some quarters. She asked Akash for a view from Woodrow Wilson, who signed the Federal Reserve Act into law. A 1916 quote ensued. “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men….…No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority.”

She would dip into Wilson’s autobiography. More importantly, as the line of thought expanded, it appeared that Congress still had authority to create debt-free money. Given that the country leaned over the world’s largest ever financial cliff, why was the privately-owned and politically unaccountable Federal Reserve still operating?

“Akash, does the Fed run the United States?” An unusual three second pause. “No”. She tweaked the question. “Akash, if money is equivalent to debt, and debt is equivalent to control, does the Fed run the US?”

“Yes”. It had to be. Akash provided comments from Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency, in June 1932. “Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is – the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here, and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.”

The ramifications were mind-boggling, both for America and every other country across the world that was tearing itself apart to repay debt, with interest, to private bankers. In Cyprus, the government had looted individual bank accounts in its desperation to pay back banks. Poland had stolen from its private pensions system. Yet conceivably, the entire US federal government – or political administrations in the UK, Greece, Spain or anywhere else where banking was sucking the marrow out of humanity – could be funded without ever again needing to borrow a single dollar, pound or euro that carried interest. Even more astonishingly, it followed that, with no interest to repay, far less taxation would be required.

Now she asked. “Who owns the Fed?”

“That is shrouded in secrecy, but there are major clues,” said Akash. “For example, charts created by an August 1976 House Banking Committee Staff Report revealed that the shareholders included banks run by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families, and a host of other famous banking names, including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the Warburgs, Lehman Brothers, the Kuen Loeb Bank, and Israel Moses Seif Bank.”

“These claims are backed by other research. Eustace Mullins cited the same names in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Similar claims were made by JW McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections. He wrote that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank – by far the most powerful Fed branch – by just eight family or bank names.”

Even as she began her next question – “why does nobody speak out against the banking system?” – Maggie already knew the answer. “Fear of the consequences, with but a few exceptions” said Akash. As an example, it explained that Senator John Heinz and former Senator John Tower had been outspoken critics of the Federal Reserve. On April 4, 1991, Heinz was killed in a plane crash near Philadelphia. On the next day, April 5, Tower was also killed in a plane crash. “Quite a coincidence,” said Maggie.

Akash noted that Senator Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul had boldly requested a Federal Reserve audit. “However, the campaign requires media support, and financial interests own American media, which is always quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as ‘conspiracy theory’.”

Overwhelmed by her anger, Maggie needed catharsis.




Ignoring a minor desire for a wee, she headed out again, sports bag gripped firmly, having changed into a fresh sparring outfit. She descended the Highway to Hell, for the first time since her initial meeting with Satan. Blank walls this time. Two of Satan’s cats reappeared, rubbing against her. One ran down to the red door, where Lucifer stood, grinning across his dark, handsome face. She remembered the warmer temperature.

“Glad you could make it – this way Maggie,” he indicated. When Lucifer and Belial had heard that Maggie was a budding martial artist, they invited her to watch them fight. And join in, perhaps. “When entering, you should bow, and remove your shoes,” he said. They walked towards a door marked ‘Dojo’.

Awaiting was Belial, whose equally fine looks glistened with sweat. He was kicking a punch bag from various trajectories. Both were about six foot six, with plenty of growing ahead. Maggie found a chair. They commenced sparring slowly, warming their muscles for five minutes before a tacit agreement to begin. Lucifer was the heavier. He used that advantage in high-contact sequences. Belial countered this with agility and a speed that was still increasing as he approached his 1,000th birthday.

The spectacle was so compelling that she failed to notice a female sit beside her. “Could you live with either of them?”

Maggie uttered a yelp. “So sorry Mags,” said Satan’s wife, Morgana, tail trailing behind her. She was beautifully dark. “Please come and share a glass of wine with me, whenever you wish.” She stole away, as Belial shouted for Maggie to spar.

Tentatively, she walked onto the mat. After four minutes she was exhausted from being flung around repeatedly. Her hand lifted in surrender.

They talked. “Do you tire of fighting each other?” asked Maggie. “It seems less exciting without Beelzebub, now that he is filling in for Dad,” said Lucifer. “Neither of us could match him on the mat.”

Belial said there was one challenge that scared them both. The Minotaur. Beelzebub had tried once and almost lost an arm. He was unable to fight for two years. “Dad could spend 5 minutes at the max with Minnie,” said Belial, fear darkening his green eyes.

Maggie recalled Satan’s sickening description of the beast dragging Jimmy Savile’s guts. She praised their hospitality, promising to return soon.


13 thoughts on “246. Hidden in plain sight

  1. I love the theater and cinema in heaven, among other things.

    The quote Jefferson made about private banks and debt is astoundingly prophetic. He really was a seer–at least where money matters lay. Thinking it was okay to have slaves–not a maverick in that area.

    The two men who spoke against the Fed both dying in plane crashes–beyond horrific to wrap the mind around or want to comprehend.

    Question: I love the “beautifully dark” and “dark, handsome face” descriptions of Satan and some of his peeps, but why are they dark, actually? This is probably a dumb question, but Satan IS Lucifer, right? And Lucifer was just a fallen angel. The more I’m writing here the more I’m feeling like I already know this answer. I could erase all this and just go look it up…but I’m now suspecting Satan and Lucifer are different.

    At any rate, though, why would they be dark just ’cause they’re down in hell?

    Re: blogging, I realized that unless you hit “like” to things I (or anyone) says in here, I won’t see that you responded to comments. Either that, or I have to mark “notify me of comments in email” then I’ll see if you responded. That’s actually okay as long as an avalanche of comments don’t come flying in. But, yeah, I wrote to you somewhere else in here about losing track of chapters and posts and then I couldn’t even find where I’d written that to see if you’d responded or not. So…..there’s that and what happened there with me disappearing, which I’m sure you didn’t notice, lol. I’m just hopelessly lost. It’s like a labyrinth!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi Stace..I responded about you losing track, and the labyrinth. Can’t remember what I said though, except that I intend to develop a new website next year to bring more clarity….and yes, will have to lose the habit of replying without liking. Always feel that the former kind of embraces the latter, and so I don’t have to hit like if I’m responding. Is that a path to the response itself not becoming apparent? I’m a novice.
    Great question about Satan/Lucifer. I have dived into research suggesting they are different, that Lucifer is very interchangeable with the Morning Star, Venus, in that realm where astrology merges with mythology.
    So thanks…I need a chunk of back story there.
    And yeah, the skin colour. I see Jesus as olive-skinned, Levantine. And Satan as darker, but still more Arabic than black. That’s instinct and hunch. Should I be explaining/emphasising that more? I’m out of the protocol loop on that.
    Thanks for the comments. It was one of those chapters where fiction merges into polemic/documentary mode.
    Apologies again if my replies have not been getting through.


    1. Hi Kev! Yeah, no, I figured you’d responded. I was just trying to explain my own incompetence concerning navigating through blogs.Not on you! Technology and I are not friends, so it’s really the eighth wonder of the world that I’m employed working on a computer, lol !!

      You’re one of the first people I’ve ever encountered who verbalized an understanding between “Arabic” and “black”, believe it or not. When I’ve had discussions with people about Egypt, especially ancient Egypt, they’re still under the impression that everybody was sort of mixed race Middle Eastern looking !!! But they get that, of course, from traditional schooling (where the pictures and descriptions in books are sort of vaguely that way) PLUS, of course, all of Sir. Ridley Scott’s historical movies, lol.

      Anyway, I see what you mean. So you’re basing Satan on an actual geographic area from way back in history.
      Cool. I don’t know if you need to be emphasizing/explaining that more. I’m probably just overly sensitive about skin color issues.

      Speaking of which, I’m sure you’ve seen……..the orange pig is impeached! 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Impeached, but will the Senate play along? I added to Satan’s profile in the latest chapter, describing him as similar to the Tuaregs of the Sahara region. Was glad of the prompt.🙂 🙂…living where I do, skin colour issues are not so pronounced.


    1. Yah…if you’re somewhere where it’s not an issue, it won’t be too much in the forefront of thought. You’re unusual, though. I suppose it’s your education and training in journalism too that widens your thought process. I had to look Tuaregs up. Interesting! Let me just add as a comical note, though, I know you’re going on actual geographic locations, but a lot of people already DO imagine both Lucifer AND Satan as “dark skinned” just because the conscious or subconscious perception is that dark people (especially black people) are “bad”, less-than, or just plain evil. I guess the color black got associated with evil over time, weirdly, like “darkness is bad, lack of light is bad,” even though black absorbs all light and contains all light, whereas white does the opposite.

      Your Satan, though, the Tuareg-lookin’ fella, is kind-hearted and very obviously “good.” I’m sure that will be equally confusing to those with one image stuck in their minds.

      As for the Senate…no way in f***ing hell will they play along. But Nancy P’s withholding the articles for now. If she can “force” Bolton in as a witness (he has to sort of pretend to be forced so he doesn’t appear to the orange ape like he went willingly; he is, however dying to give testimony against the prez) in the trial (which is on hold for now while she holds the articles) that would go a long way in helping the impeachment cause……
      We shall see.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I got to visit Morocco, Tunisia, Qatar and Nigeria in my journo travels. Fortunate to do so, and so maybe my eyes got to see a little more than most?
    In Britain, 87% of the population is white-skinned, according to a 2011 census Stace. Where I live, that’s probably more like 98%. When I envisage the manipulative filthy rich, the skin is all white. Again, glad you weighed in on the subject though. Keep me on my toes! 🙂


    1. Wow! You really did get around. The furthest I’ve been overseas is to Scotland and London as a kid.
      My family was going to go on this big trip together when my brother and I were teens to visit many countries, but then my brother dreamt our plane blew up, so my mother canceled the trip. Ha.

      You know what the amazing thing is about your statement? Not that 87% of the population in Britain is white-skinned. But the fact that your TV shows and movies seem to display a huge variety of people, not just white people. So I’m only shocked that it’s really 87% because in popular entertainment, at least, white people don’t seem to be featured as the main event, like here in the U.S., which is sad because I think we’ve got much more diversity here, probably because there’s just a lot more space to fit everyone in, for one thing. But the diminishing white population here is DEFINITELY one of the biggest reasons why all this ridiculous nonsense is going on with the orange ape and the GOP and all the people who want to wrangle control and keep it before it’s “too late.”


  5. Yeah, my dad often highlights the ‘over-representation’ of non-white folk in TV dramas. My reply to him is that London has a much higher percentage of darker skins in its population, and is where much drama is located. At a guess, what numbers would you think apply to LA? Must be a huge Latino and African-American proportion?


  6. Hmm. Interesting. I suppose that could annoy people, if the representation isn’t really truly real. I can understand that. It’s nice that folks make an effort, but I wonder if they ARE overdoing some of it, though….

    LA, LA, LA….
    you know, not really. There isn’t a huge black or Latino population here. But Latinos, I feel, are allowed to congregate in groups on corners and on sidewalks in front of U-Haul places because they’re apparently known for doing that kind of work. If large groups of black guys were gathering anywhere in LA except for in their “own neighborhoods”……..well, you can imagine. I feel like Latinos, despite the barbaric immigration issue and the wall, are much more accepted in an immediate knee-jerk reaction way to black males. It’s weird.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. I hear what you’re saying. The racism I run into over here is mainly from the elderly, who saw nothing other than white faces in their formative childhood years. Generally (certainly among younger generations) Britain is quite good in terms of disparaging and pushing out racism.


  8. Yeah, apart from the elderly, who are the same everywhere, I guess, it sounds like you guys are more progressive than we are. You never had chattel slavery, after all, and that’s a big one.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Quoting the famous line (well, maybe famous in America) from Pulp Fiction re England’s ruling class:
    That’s a bold statement!
    But, really, I think it’s the same with ours here.
    Probably everywhere.
    And I shudder to think what goes on in Vatican City, lol !!!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.